• Log in
  • Cart (0)
  • Checkout
  • SHOP
  • BLOG
  • LIBRARY 
    • View All
    • Gallery
    • Events & Media
    • Wheel Building
    • Wheel Fanatyk Products
    • Tech
    • Reflections
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
Blog
Home   Blog   Low Spoke Numbers, pt 1

Low Spoke Numbers, pt 1

July 04, 2022 2 Comments

Reduced spoke counts became a mass trend that continues today. Part fad, part function—it affects us all. Let’s explore the topic of spoke count and try to answer the question: what is the correct spoke number?

The 36 Spoke Era
For a century spoke number remained stable at 36, a choice that, despite its relatively high density, has advantages:
  1. Compasses and drafting tools are marked in degrees, 360 per revolution—dividing by 10 is ultimately simple. 36 is a familiar number, easily shared and adopted.
  2. Bicycles use wheel diameters of 20”–29”, convenient for the human body and the terrain we navigate. 36 spokes allows enough room between nipples for wrench turning.
  3. Steel wire so successfully holds high tension that a high number makes only a small weight—72 spokes and nipples = only one pound.
  4. High spoke density provides lots of support, permitting a wide range of rim materials—wood, steel, aluminum, and composites.
So bicycles propelled by 36 spoke wheels swept the planet.
  1. First came the era of wood rims, widely used and dominant for competition (1900–1950).
  2. Post WWII, aluminum developed for aviation allowed hollow shapes, rim hooks for demountable tires, and wing-like profiles with lower wind resistance (1950–2000).
  3. The arrival of composites (carbon fiber, etc.) permitted complex, large aerodynamic shapes without serious weight penalty (2000+).

The Beginning of Low Spoke Numbers
Aerodynamic awareness arrived to cycling suddenly in the early 1980’s. In 1983 Rory O’Reilly (US National Team) ran aerodynamic tests at the University of Washington tunnel, discovering a nearly direct correlation between wind resistance and spoke number—half the spoke number = half the aerodynamic drag—a big surprise. We then built an 20 spoke front wheel on which he won the first US Pan American cycling gold (kilo, Bogota, 1983). Undrilled Specialized hub became 20H20 was a radical number for an event like the kilo.Araya rim, holes welded shut, redrilled to 20.

Many low (16–24) spoke wheels were used by the US to win 9 medals at the 1984 LA Games. Regardless of their precise role in winning, low spoke counts were off to a conspicuous start and began appearing worldwide.

Building those wheels showed that rims had advanced further than we appreciated. 36 spokes was now often overkill. Experimentation revealed that spokes could be missing and wheels still retain satisfactory strength. A major chapter in wheel design began with the crossing of two unrelated trends—rim technology and aerodynamic goals.

Tinkerers cannot resist breaking rules and bushwhacking off the beaten path. We rode wheels that were too small, too light, too cheap, etc. just for curiosity and excitement. Some wheel tinkerers in the 1980’s were hard to miss:

  1. Mavic created the Gitane TT bike in 1980 for Hinault. Note the aero downtube, faired head tube, hidden control wires, 24H wheels, hidden seat binder bolt, reversed front brake… all radical for the time.
    Gitane Profil, 1980. Visit Speedbicycles.ch
  2. Roval introduced clever low spoke count wheels in 1979. A Maillard hub with special flange fairings.
    Note the radical features: hidden nipples, bladed spokes, flange fairings, straight pull spokes, and large section rim.Nearly 22mm x 22mm, huge for the era.
    Managing Loads 
    1. The hub provides the bracing angle (width between flanges), the rim and spokes further define the structure—a stronger rim needs fewer spokes and vice versa.
    2. The sum of spoke tensions affects a wheel’s capacity for load—more spokes at lower tension is equivalent to fewer spokes at higher tension.
    3. A more rigid rim distributes loads over more spokes so, for a given force, it can resist deformation with less spoke support.
    4. If a spoke breaks, a more rigid rim can maintain trueness with less spoke support.

    Wheel design is a balancing act—a low spoke number can be offset by a stronger rim and higher tension. A high spoke count like 36, takes much of the burden off the rim and spokes—a forgiving environment tolerant of lesser materials and build quality. One of the bicycle’s great accomplishments is its success in impoverished situations.

    IMO
    The availability of advanced materials and aerodynamic ideas aren’t enough to explain the continued popularity of low spoke numbers. Aerodynamics is of low value to most riders. Benefits accrue at speeds they rarely maintain. Much of the popularity of low spoke count wheels must be owed to fashion, to aspirations—like riding in a professional team uniform. No harm unless you think you’re going faster!

    The industry pushes trends as do fashion scenes—trying to accelerate cycles of adoption and obsolescence. The good news is that millions of low spoke wheels (especially the common 20 x 24 road combo) are in use with very, very few complaints.

    Is there a right number? There are too many variables—combinations, balancing factors, aesthetic concerns, riders, and budgets to begin to define what is a "right" spoke number. If you get down to a specific application, experience is the only guide. Common sense argues for themes like:

    1. Minimize complexity, weight, and expense when there is little benefit.
    2. Err on the conservative side—safety first! Weather, gravity, and road conditions can’t be controlled—that’s enough uncertainty without adding risky wheels.
    3. Practicality always counts—use equipment that’s available, even if not perfect—this is the way of cyclists.
    4. Dismiss bias about spoke numbers and approach situations with an open mind. Absorb the free lessons that come your way. 
    5. Experiment and test but on yourself and on your own time. You are a builder to serve the needs of riders, not the other way around!
      Whaaat???













    Tweet Share Pin It Email

    2 Responses

    Peter jenner
    Peter jenner

    January 30, 2023

    We tried front wheel radial with as little as 8 spokes, wheel collapsed!

    Mark Petry
    Mark Petry

    January 23, 2023

    this was a good article ! I find that rider weight and style have a big impact on spoke counts and rim selection. For me at 190 lb, a 28 spoke front / 32 rear is a good combination with 2X lacing except on the rear drive side, 3X. thanks

    Leave a comment

    Comments will be approved before showing up.

    +Search the Library

    +Library Categories

    • View All Library Archive
    • Gallery
    • Events & Media
    • Wheel Building
    • Wheel Fanatyk Products
    • Tech
    • Reflections

    +Shop the Store

    • Lacing
    • Measuring
    • Threading
    • Truing
    • Useful Bits
    • Manuals
    Quick Links
    • Shop
    • About
    • Library
    • Blog
    • Contact
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Sign up to get the latest on sales, new releases and more…

    Wheel Fanatyk

    Wheel Fanatyk is an opportunity to share about how bicycles and wheels work—what makes them last longer and ride better, and what tools help us build them finer and faster. 


    © 2023 Wheel Fanatyk. Website Design & Development by Tumbleweed Creative

    American Express Apple Pay Diners Club Discover Meta Pay Google Pay Mastercard PayPal Shop Pay Venmo Visa